3 min readNew Findings Contradict Current Views on Cancer Stem Cells
Berkeley, CA – New findings in breast cancer research by an international team of scientists contradict the prevailing belief that only basal-like cells with stem cell qualities can form invasive tumours. Research led by Ole William Petersen at the University of Copenhagen (CU) and Mina Bissell of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and has shown that luminal-like cells with no detectable stem cell qualities can generate larger tumours than their basal-like counterparts.
This may hold important implications for the diagnosis and the treatment of breast cancer as well as future personalized cancer medicine.
“It is fashionable to think of breast cancer as a disease that can be treated if cancer stem cells are killed off, but we are reporting a sub-population of cancer cells that have no obvious stem cell properties and yet can be tumourigenic and highly aggressive,” Bissell says. “The existence of these additional sub-populations of tumorigenic cells tells us that the entire tumour needs to be eradicated, not just one sub-population of basal-like cells.”
Bissell is a leading authority on breast cancer and a Distinguished Scientist with Berkeley Lab’s Life Sciences Division. Petersen is a professor of Tissue Morphogenesis and Differentiation for CU’s Cellular and Molecular Medicine department and a principal investigator for the Danish Stem Cell Center. They are the corresponding authors of a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that describes this work. The paper is titled “Tumor initiating but differentiated luminal-like breast cancer cells are highly invasive in the absence of basal-like activity.” Other co-authors were Jiyoung Kim, René Villadsen, Therese Sørlie, Louise Fogh, Signe Grønlund, Agla Fridriksdottir, Irene Kuhn, Fritz Rank, Vera Timmermans Wielenga, Hiroko Solvang, Paul Edwards, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale and Lone Rønnov-Jessen.
“Our findings were a surprise to us as we had hypothesized the opposite scenario,” Petersen says. “We wanted to learn more about possible tumour suppressive properties so we set out to characterize the bulk of the tumour, which we assumed would not be tumour-initiating.”
Most breast cancers originate in the milk ducts and lobules, which consist of luminal cells surrounded by basal cells, and the two most frequent subtypes of human breast cancer cells are named luminal-like and basal-like after their resemblance to the two major lineages in the normal human breast. For the past several years, it has been widely believed that basal-like cells with the undifferentiated qualities of stem cells were the source of invasive tumours. However, since a majority of breast cancers exhibit luminal cell differentiation, the Petersen-Bissell collaboration investigated whether luminal-like differentiated cells within a basal-like cell hierarchy could also become tumorigenic, or must these luminal-like cells acquire basal-like traits to become malignant.
“We applied some rare and mutually exclusive lineage markers to isolate subsets of luminal-like and basal-like breast cancer cells, which enabled us to do single cell cloning with a reasonable success rate,” Petersen says. “We enriched for populations with or without prominent basal-like traits from individual tumours, and from single cell cloning of cell lines and recovered cells with a luminal-like phenotype.”
What they discovered was that luminal-like cells without specific basal-like traits were fully capable of initiating tumours in laboratory test mice; in fact, the tumours generated by luminal-like cells were larger than those from basal-like cells. In addition, when tested in an invasion assay, these phenotypically pure luminal-like cells were more invasive than the basal-like cells.
“Our findings demonstrate that basal-like cells, as defined currently, are not a requirement for breast tumour aggressiveness and that within a single tumour there are multiple cells with tumourigenic potential,” Bissell says. “This casts doubt on the current hypothesis of hierarchical or differentiative loss of tumourigenicity.”
The marker used by the Petersen-Bissell collaboration to isolate the luminal-like cancer cells was milk mucin (MM), one of the glycans, the sugar molecules that are ubiquitous to cell surfaces and central to cellular signaling. Basal-like cancer cells were marked with the protein CD271. The MM glycan was detected by the antibody M18. The CD271 marker was detected by the ME20.4 antibody.
In their investigation, the collaborators found that the ability of the luminal-like breast cancer cells to form large invasive tumours depended on the expression of the glycoprotein gene GCNT1, which in turn is required for the MM glycan to be detected by the M18 antibody. The collaborators believe this finding might be of potential clinical importance for breast cancer as co-author Kuhn, a member of Bissell’s research group, explains.
“There has been an increasing appreciation that glycans play an important role in malignant behaviour and our work shows that inhibiting the activity of GCNT1 could prevent the invasive behaviour of the aggressive luminal-like cancer cells if they express the MM epitope,” she says.
While Petersen emphasizes that any clinical implications of this work remains speculative at this time, the finding that multiple types of cells in breast cancers are capable of initiating invasive tumours, he says, could hold implications for future personalized medicine.
“While new avenues in breast cancer targeting have been strongly influenced by the concepts of tumour subtypes and cancer stem cells, we believe our data and recent data from other laboratories opens the possibility of targeting individual stages of differentiation of breast cancer cells within a tumour,” Petersen says. “In that way personalized medicine in the future could rely on a cellular-composition-profile with each cellular component accounted for in the treatment design.”